https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191135 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of cenvat credit on capital goods installed outside the factory premises and duty demand for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found the interest liability confirmation inappropriate due to lack of evidence of wrongful availment of cenvat credit. Additionally, the duty demand for clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable as the Department failed to provide evidence supporting the claim, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191135 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of cenvat credit on capital goods installed outside the factory premises and duty demand for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found the interest liability confirmation inappropriate due to lack of evidence of wrongful availment of cenvat credit. Additionally, the duty demand for clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable as the Department failed to provide evidence supporting the claim, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191135