https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191129 The court upheld the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation by the designated authority, finding that the authority's actions were in accordance with the law and procedural requirements. The court determined that the evidence provided in the application for initiating the investigation was adequate and accurate, satisfying the requirements under the relevant rules. Additionally, the court affirmed the jurisdiction of the designated authority to initiate the proceedings, emphasizing that the authority had not acted arbitrarily or in violation of statutory provisions. The writ petitions were rejected, allowing the petitioners to submit their questionnaire within 15 days from the judgment date. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:58:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191129 The court upheld the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation by the designated authority, finding that the authority's actions were in accordance with the law and procedural requirements. The court determined that the evidence provided in the application for initiating the investigation was adequate and accurate, satisfying the requirements under the relevant rules. Additionally, the court affirmed the jurisdiction of the designated authority to initiate the proceedings, emphasizing that the authority had not acted arbitrarily or in violation of statutory provisions. The writ petitions were rejected, allowing the petitioners to submit their questionnaire within 15 days from the judgment date. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191129