<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7143</link>
    <description>A partial partition of Hindu undivided family properties confined to agricultural lands was held genuine where the properties were actually divided, registry was transferred, and the allotted lands were separately managed and assessed; continued common residence did not by itself make the arrangement a sham or a settlement. The court also held that a statutory limitation period for revision governs the completion of the revisional power, so a suo motu revisional order passed after expiry of that period was time-barred. The impugned revisional order failed on both merits and limitation and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7143</link>
      <description>A partial partition of Hindu undivided family properties confined to agricultural lands was held genuine where the properties were actually divided, registry was transferred, and the allotted lands were separately managed and assessed; continued common residence did not by itself make the arrangement a sham or a settlement. The court also held that a statutory limitation period for revision governs the completion of the revisional power, so a suo motu revisional order passed after expiry of that period was time-barred. The impugned revisional order failed on both merits and limitation and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>