<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 620 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191119</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, reinstating the Arbitrator&#039;s award. The contractor&#039;s appeal was allowed, while the Union of India&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Arbitrator&#039;s interpretation of the contract and conditional offers was upheld, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference in arbitration awards, unless jurisdiction is exceeded or misconduct occurs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 620 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191119</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s judgment, reinstating the Arbitrator&#039;s award. The contractor&#039;s appeal was allowed, while the Union of India&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Arbitrator&#039;s interpretation of the contract and conditional offers was upheld, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference in arbitration awards, unless jurisdiction is exceeded or misconduct occurs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>