<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191112</link>
    <description>Orders denying Small Scale Industry exemption on the basis of clubbing the units could not be sustained where the merits had not been independently examined in light of earlier High Court directions. The impugned orders largely repeated the earlier departmental finding that the units were not independent, but the prior writ proceedings had already set aside the earlier adjudication and required a fresh decision in accordance with law. The Tribunal therefore held that the matters could not be finally decided on the existing record and set aside the orders, remanding all connected proceedings for fresh adjudication by the Commissioner together.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191112</link>
      <description>Orders denying Small Scale Industry exemption on the basis of clubbing the units could not be sustained where the merits had not been independently examined in light of earlier High Court directions. The impugned orders largely repeated the earlier departmental finding that the units were not independent, but the prior writ proceedings had already set aside the earlier adjudication and required a fresh decision in accordance with law. The Tribunal therefore held that the matters could not be finally decided on the existing record and set aside the orders, remanding all connected proceedings for fresh adjudication by the Commissioner together.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>