<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1452 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191111</link>
    <description>Denial of Cenvat credit on mechanical machines, parts, electrical instrumentation and similar items was set aside because an identical issue in the assessee&#039;s own case had already been remanded by the Tribunal. The existing order was therefore not sustained on merits, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to reconsider the credit claim afresh in line with the earlier decision. The matter was to be decided again after following principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1452 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191111</link>
      <description>Denial of Cenvat credit on mechanical machines, parts, electrical instrumentation and similar items was set aside because an identical issue in the assessee&#039;s own case had already been remanded by the Tribunal. The existing order was therefore not sustained on merits, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to reconsider the credit claim afresh in line with the earlier decision. The matter was to be decided again after following principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>