<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7141</link>
    <description>Commercial expediency under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 requires expenditure to have a real and proximate nexus with business operations; political contributions based on speculative goodwill or remote expected advantage do not qualify as deductible business expenditure. Wealth-tax payable was not deductible as business expenditure or under the claimed specific heads. The appellate enhancement power extended to correcting assessment errors concerning items already considered by the Income-tax Officer, notwithstanding parallel reassessment or rectification proceedings. A corporate subscription made without authority in its memorandum of association was ultra vires when paid, and a later amendment could not retrospectively validate or ratify it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7141</link>
      <description>Commercial expediency under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 requires expenditure to have a real and proximate nexus with business operations; political contributions based on speculative goodwill or remote expected advantage do not qualify as deductible business expenditure. Wealth-tax payable was not deductible as business expenditure or under the claimed specific heads. The appellate enhancement power extended to correcting assessment errors concerning items already considered by the Income-tax Officer, notwithstanding parallel reassessment or rectification proceedings. A corporate subscription made without authority in its memorandum of association was ultra vires when paid, and a later amendment could not retrospectively validate or ratify it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>