<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (5) TMI 6 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7139</link>
    <description>Relief under section 15C was unavailable because the industrial undertaking was formed with machinery previously used in a business carried on before 1 April 1948, bringing the statutory exclusion into play. The proviso to section 13 was also attracted because the assessee&#039;s accounting records, including the absence of a proper daily consumption record and stock register, did not provide a reliable basis for determining true profits. Even where a different basis of computation is justified, any income estimate must rest on some material and cannot be arbitrary or conjectural; the impugned computation was therefore unsustainable for want of supporting material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (5) TMI 6 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7139</link>
      <description>Relief under section 15C was unavailable because the industrial undertaking was formed with machinery previously used in a business carried on before 1 April 1948, bringing the statutory exclusion into play. The proviso to section 13 was also attracted because the assessee&#039;s accounting records, including the absence of a proper daily consumption record and stock register, did not provide a reliable basis for determining true profits. Even where a different basis of computation is justified, any income estimate must rest on some material and cannot be arbitrary or conjectural; the impugned computation was therefore unsustainable for want of supporting material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>