<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 930 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340427</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to insufficient evidence to establish the manufacture and clearance of the final product without duty payment. The judgment addressed issues related to improper Cenvat Credit availment, allegations of clandestine removal, and lack of evidence supporting duty demands. The Member (Judicial) upheld the decisions of the lower authorities in favor of the respondent, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with their findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 930 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340427</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to insufficient evidence to establish the manufacture and clearance of the final product without duty payment. The judgment addressed issues related to improper Cenvat Credit availment, allegations of clandestine removal, and lack of evidence supporting duty demands. The Member (Judicial) upheld the decisions of the lower authorities in favor of the respondent, concluding that there was no basis to interfere with their findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>