https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340423 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand. The evidence presented by the Revenue lacked corroboration and detailed investigation, failing to substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal. The judgment highlighted the necessity of concrete and reliable evidence for serious charges like clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340423 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand. The evidence presented by the Revenue lacked corroboration and detailed investigation, failing to substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal. The judgment highlighted the necessity of concrete and reliable evidence for serious charges like clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340423