<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of China origin mobile phones due to non-declaration of MRP but set aside penalties for importers with no established relation to the seized goods. Penalties imposed on various appellants were modified based on circumstances, with some penalties reduced or eliminated. The Final Order was not interfered with except for penalties on two importers, which were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of China origin mobile phones due to non-declaration of MRP but set aside penalties for importers with no established relation to the seized goods. Penalties imposed on various appellants were modified based on circumstances, with some penalties reduced or eliminated. The Final Order was not interfered with except for penalties on two importers, which were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>