<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 882 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the AO for a fresh decision on computing capital gains when investing in exemption bonds. The judgment clarifies the application of Sec.50C for capital gains computation and emphasizes the importance of specific property valuation for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 882 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the AO for a fresh decision on computing capital gains when investing in exemption bonds. The judgment clarifies the application of Sec.50C for capital gains computation and emphasizes the importance of specific property valuation for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>