<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 876 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340373</link>
    <description>HC held that entries in the books are not conclusive; the legal character of expenditure (revenue or capital) depends on law, not bookkeeping. The expenditure on technical and marketing knowhow was treated as revenue by the Revenue and therefore the entire Rs. 18.67 crores was allowed as a deduction in the subject assessment year. The decision, relying on prior authority, was in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 876 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340373</link>
      <description>HC held that entries in the books are not conclusive; the legal character of expenditure (revenue or capital) depends on law, not bookkeeping. The expenditure on technical and marketing knowhow was treated as revenue by the Revenue and therefore the entire Rs. 18.67 crores was allowed as a deduction in the subject assessment year. The decision, relying on prior authority, was in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>