<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1570 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191109</link>
    <description>The mandatory 90-day timeline for completing an inquiry under Regulation 20(5) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was treated as binding. Because the inquiry report was completed and submitted beyond that prescribed period, the revocation proceedings were held unsustainable. The non-compliance with the statutory time limit vitiated the revocation process, and the impugned revocation order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1570 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191109</link>
      <description>The mandatory 90-day timeline for completing an inquiry under Regulation 20(5) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was treated as binding. Because the inquiry report was completed and submitted beyond that prescribed period, the revocation proceedings were held unsustainable. The non-compliance with the statutory time limit vitiated the revocation process, and the impugned revocation order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>