<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191082</link>
    <description>Interest paid by an Indian branch to its head office and overseas branches is treated as a payment to self and was held allowable as a deduction; on that basis, no tax deduction at source was required. Disallowance under section 14A was upheld only for exempt income from tax-free bonds where investments were found to be made from own funds, but the component relating to PSA Sical Terminals Ltd. required fresh factual examination because the basis of apportionment of interest and other expenses had not been properly examined. Year-end revaluation loss on outstanding foreign exchange contracts was treated as a real business loss and was allowable as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1452 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191082</link>
      <description>Interest paid by an Indian branch to its head office and overseas branches is treated as a payment to self and was held allowable as a deduction; on that basis, no tax deduction at source was required. Disallowance under section 14A was upheld only for exempt income from tax-free bonds where investments were found to be made from own funds, but the component relating to PSA Sical Terminals Ltd. required fresh factual examination because the basis of apportionment of interest and other expenses had not been properly examined. Year-end revaluation loss on outstanding foreign exchange contracts was treated as a real business loss and was allowable as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>