<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee-appellant, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit on insurance, real estate agent, and event management services. It held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on these services based on legal precedents and the business activities conducted. The imposition of penalties on the appellant was rejected as the denial of credit was deemed incorrect. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalties was dismissed, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee-appellant, overturning the denial of CENVAT credit on insurance, real estate agent, and event management services. It held that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on these services based on legal precedents and the business activities conducted. The imposition of penalties on the appellant was rejected as the denial of credit was deemed incorrect. The Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalties was dismissed, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>