<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 869 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting refunds for unutilized Cenvat Credit on input services used in manufacturing final products cleared for export under the 100% EOU scheme. The Tribunal held that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, effective from 10.09.2004, permitted such refunds even before the issuance of notification no. 5/2006. The decision emphasized that the rule itself allowed for refunds on input services used in exported goods, and the subsequent notification only extended the rule&#039;s applicability without introducing new provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 869 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting refunds for unutilized Cenvat Credit on input services used in manufacturing final products cleared for export under the 100% EOU scheme. The Tribunal held that Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, effective from 10.09.2004, permitted such refunds even before the issuance of notification no. 5/2006. The decision emphasized that the rule itself allowed for refunds on input services used in exported goods, and the subsequent notification only extended the rule&#039;s applicability without introducing new provisions. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>