<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 847 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340344</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal in a case concerning the valuation of captively consumed goods under Rule 8 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving excisability and marketability of goods used in manufacturing before applying Rule 8 for valuation. As the Revenue failed to establish these crucial elements, the Tribunal found it inappropriate to invoke Rule 8, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 847 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340344</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal in a case concerning the valuation of captively consumed goods under Rule 8 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of proving excisability and marketability of goods used in manufacturing before applying Rule 8 for valuation. As the Revenue failed to establish these crucial elements, the Tribunal found it inappropriate to invoke Rule 8, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>