https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340343 An identical exemption dispute concerning atraumatic needled sutures had already been decided in favour of the assessee under the same central excise notifications, and the Department's challenge to that view had failed before the Supreme Court. Following that settled position, the Tribunal held that the demand, penalties and confiscation could not be sustained. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessee obtained consequential relief. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:53:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340343 An identical exemption dispute concerning atraumatic needled sutures had already been decided in favour of the assessee under the same central excise notifications, and the Department's challenge to that view had failed before the Supreme Court. Following that settled position, the Tribunal held that the demand, penalties and confiscation could not be sustained. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessee obtained consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340343