<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 844 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Service Tax paid on Outdoor Catering Service qualifies as an &quot;Input Service&quot; under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, aligning with precedents from prior court decisions. Consequently, the initial order was reversed, and the appeals were granted, potentially enabling the appellant to seek further relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 844 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Service Tax paid on Outdoor Catering Service qualifies as an &quot;Input Service&quot; under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, aligning with precedents from prior court decisions. Consequently, the initial order was reversed, and the appeals were granted, potentially enabling the appellant to seek further relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>