https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340339 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of input service credit for servicing cars, cleaning service, and Agri-Horticulture services. The judge held that all three services qualified as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) based on legal precedents and interpretations. The appeal was allowed in full, granting the appellant entitlement to any consequential benefits as per the law. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:32:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340339 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of input service credit for servicing cars, cleaning service, and Agri-Horticulture services. The judge held that all three services qualified as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) based on legal precedents and interpretations. The appeal was allowed in full, granting the appellant entitlement to any consequential benefits as per the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340339