<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 840 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340337</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal challenging the denial of Cenvat Credit on services like Rent-a-cab, Mandap Keeper/Hotel services, and Courier. The appellant claimed credit based on precedents from the Gujarat High Court and Tribunal. The Revenue argued against the credit. The Member (Judicial) remanded the case to verify if the appellant had recovered service charges for Rent-a-cab, a crucial factor for credit eligibility. The appeal was disposed of pending this verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:32:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 840 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340337</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal challenging the denial of Cenvat Credit on services like Rent-a-cab, Mandap Keeper/Hotel services, and Courier. The appellant claimed credit based on precedents from the Gujarat High Court and Tribunal. The Revenue argued against the credit. The Member (Judicial) remanded the case to verify if the appellant had recovered service charges for Rent-a-cab, a crucial factor for credit eligibility. The appeal was disposed of pending this verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>