https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340332 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeals regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on various input services. The Tribunal found that the disputed services satisfied the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, as they were used for manufacturing business activity. Since the Revenue failed to provide contradictory judgments and the appellant demonstrated the services' eligibility, the impugned Order denying credit and imposing penalties was set aside. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the Cenvat Credit on the disputed input services. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:30:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340332 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeals regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on various input services. The Tribunal found that the disputed services satisfied the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004, as they were used for manufacturing business activity. Since the Revenue failed to provide contradictory judgments and the appellant demonstrated the services' eligibility, the impugned Order denying credit and imposing penalties was set aside. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the Cenvat Credit on the disputed input services. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340332