<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340323</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because of mismatch in departmental particulars or cancellation of the seller&#039;s registration; the assessing authority must examine whether the transaction was genuine, compare the cancellation date with the invoice date, and rely on cogent material before treating purchases as bogus. Mere non-filing of objections does not permit automatic confirmation of pre-assessment proposals. Any material used to deny credit must be furnished to the assessee, and a reasonable opportunity of hearing must be given before finalising the assessment. On these grounds, the assessment orders were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh assessment after compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340323</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because of mismatch in departmental particulars or cancellation of the seller&#039;s registration; the assessing authority must examine whether the transaction was genuine, compare the cancellation date with the invoice date, and rely on cogent material before treating purchases as bogus. Mere non-filing of objections does not permit automatic confirmation of pre-assessment proposals. Any material used to deny credit must be furnished to the assessee, and a reasonable opportunity of hearing must be given before finalising the assessment. On these grounds, the assessment orders were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh assessment after compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>