https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340320 The Tribunal allowed the petitioner to withdraw C.P.No. 285/2013 without the liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner's argument that Section 634A of the Companies Act, 1956 was ineffective due to subsequent amendments was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal clarified that the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 remained valid until the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, preserving the petitioner's rights under the former Act. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:01:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340320 The Tribunal allowed the petitioner to withdraw C.P.No. 285/2013 without the liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner's argument that Section 634A of the Companies Act, 1956 was ineffective due to subsequent amendments was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal clarified that the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 remained valid until the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, preserving the petitioner's rights under the former Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340320