<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340315</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition of undisclosed sales, commission payments, and the legality of assessment reopening without providing reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict compliance with legal requirements in assessment proceedings and upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions based on the evidence and legal principles presented during the hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340315</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition of undisclosed sales, commission payments, and the legality of assessment reopening without providing reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict compliance with legal requirements in assessment proceedings and upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions based on the evidence and legal principles presented during the hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>