<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 816 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E in the intimation issued under Section 200A was invalid before the amendment effective from 1.6.2015. The Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to levy such fees during that period. The late fee imposed was deleted, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 816 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E in the intimation issued under Section 200A was invalid before the amendment effective from 1.6.2015. The Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to levy such fees during that period. The late fee imposed was deleted, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>