<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 815 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) was not authorized to impose fees under section 234E through intimation under section 200A for defaults before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and canceled the fees charged under section 234E. The appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14 was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 815 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) was not authorized to impose fees under section 234E through intimation under section 200A for defaults before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders and canceled the fees charged under section 234E. The appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14 was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>