<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 809 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340306</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the rectification proceedings under Section 154 invalid due to the absence of an apparent mistake in the CIT&#039;s order under Section 264 and the time-barred nature of the rectification order. Additionally, it determined that municipal taxes received from tenants should not be classified as income from other sources. The tribunal directed the deletion of the tax addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 809 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340306</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the rectification proceedings under Section 154 invalid due to the absence of an apparent mistake in the CIT&#039;s order under Section 264 and the time-barred nature of the rectification order. Additionally, it determined that municipal taxes received from tenants should not be classified as income from other sources. The tribunal directed the deletion of the tax addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>