<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 805 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against orders for AY 2006-07 and AY 2010-11, remanding certain issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgments highlighted the necessity for expenses to be wholly and exclusively laid out for earning income to be allowable under the Income Tax Act, specifically disallowing expenses under Section 57(iii) and directing re-computation of disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 805 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals against orders for AY 2006-07 and AY 2010-11, remanding certain issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The judgments highlighted the necessity for expenses to be wholly and exclusively laid out for earning income to be allowable under the Income Tax Act, specifically disallowing expenses under Section 57(iii) and directing re-computation of disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>