<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 796 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the medical practitioner, granting relief on the inclusion of cheque entries while upholding the decision on unexplained cash deposits and application of peak credit theory. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence to support claims and dismissed generic explanations without substantive corroboration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 796 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the medical practitioner, granting relief on the inclusion of cheque entries while upholding the decision on unexplained cash deposits and application of peak credit theory. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence to support claims and dismissed generic explanations without substantive corroboration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>