<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to the remaining 10% additional depreciation for the assessment year 2012-13. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the balance 50% depreciation, i.e., 10% additional depreciation, during the year under consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:31:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to the remaining 10% additional depreciation for the assessment year 2012-13. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the balance 50% depreciation, i.e., 10% additional depreciation, during the year under consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>