<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 777 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340274</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 43/2001-CE (N.T.) was available only if the duty-free HDPE bags were actually used for packing export goods. The record showed sales of soyabean de-oiled cakes to merchant exporters, but the invoices and clearance documents did not establish that those goods were packed in the duty-free bags or link the bags to the exported consignments. H Forms proved export of goods, yet they did not by themselves satisfy the notification conditions. In the absence of a direct evidentiary nexus between the procured packing material and the exports, entitlement to the duty-free benefit was not shown and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 777 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340274</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 43/2001-CE (N.T.) was available only if the duty-free HDPE bags were actually used for packing export goods. The record showed sales of soyabean de-oiled cakes to merchant exporters, but the invoices and clearance documents did not establish that those goods were packed in the duty-free bags or link the bags to the exported consignments. H Forms proved export of goods, yet they did not by themselves satisfy the notification conditions. In the absence of a direct evidentiary nexus between the procured packing material and the exports, entitlement to the duty-free benefit was not shown and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>