https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340271 The judgment addressed issues including confiscation of excess goods and currency, demand confirmation under the Central Excise Act, allegations of clandestine activities, violation of natural justice, cross-examination of witnesses, and legal implications of evidence. The court found procedural flaws, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination and examining witnesses in chief. Due to these irregularities, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication to ensure fair consideration of evidence and compliance with legal procedures. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:55:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340271 The judgment addressed issues including confiscation of excess goods and currency, demand confirmation under the Central Excise Act, allegations of clandestine activities, violation of natural justice, cross-examination of witnesses, and legal implications of evidence. The court found procedural flaws, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination and examining witnesses in chief. Due to these irregularities, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication to ensure fair consideration of evidence and compliance with legal procedures. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340271