<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the payment of supervision charges, finding no infirmity in the order. The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced in court on 08.03.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 771 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the payment of supervision charges, finding no infirmity in the order. The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced in court on 08.03.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>