https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340262 The tribunal remanded the case concerning a reduction in penalty imposed on an appellant company and Director under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. Emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence and discrepancies, the tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider the matter. The case involved allegations of clandestine removal of goods without excise duty payment, discrepancies in demand computation, and non-supply of relevant statements to the appellant. The judgment underscored the importance of addressing discrepancies, providing all evidence, and upholding principles of natural justice in excise duty cases, ensuring a fair adjudication process. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:55:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340262 The tribunal remanded the case concerning a reduction in penalty imposed on an appellant company and Director under Section 11AC of CEA, 1944. Emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence and discrepancies, the tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to reconsider the matter. The case involved allegations of clandestine removal of goods without excise duty payment, discrepancies in demand computation, and non-supply of relevant statements to the appellant. The judgment underscored the importance of addressing discrepancies, providing all evidence, and upholding principles of natural justice in excise duty cases, ensuring a fair adjudication process. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340262