https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191072 For the three-year bar under the proviso to Section 21(1) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, the relevant date of purchase is the date of execution of the registered sale deed, because Section 47 of the Registration Act gives the instrument operative effect from execution, not the later registration entry. On that basis, an application for release filed more than three years after execution was not hit by the proviso. The challenge to maintainability therefore failed, and the eviction decree in favour of the landlady was affirmed. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:54:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191072 For the three-year bar under the proviso to Section 21(1) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, the relevant date of purchase is the date of execution of the registered sale deed, because Section 47 of the Registration Act gives the instrument operative effect from execution, not the later registration entry. On that basis, an application for release filed more than three years after execution was not hit by the proviso. The challenge to maintainability therefore failed, and the eviction decree in favour of the landlady was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191072