<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 756 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing that payment of duty discharged the goods from the Customs Notification&#039;s ambit, precluding confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Regarding the imposition of penalties on the importer for non-compliance with notification conditions, the Tribunal found that duty payment absolved the importer from penalties or confiscation, in line with legal precedents. The appeal was rejected, affirming the impugned order and disposing of the cross objection filed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 756 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing that payment of duty discharged the goods from the Customs Notification&#039;s ambit, precluding confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Regarding the imposition of penalties on the importer for non-compliance with notification conditions, the Tribunal found that duty payment absolved the importer from penalties or confiscation, in line with legal precedents. The appeal was rejected, affirming the impugned order and disposing of the cross objection filed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>