<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 752 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340249</link>
    <description>Compounding of Companies Act offences is limited to inadvertent, bona fide statutory lapses and is inappropriate where the defaults involve deliberate and mala fide non-compliance. On the stated facts, the misconduct included fabrication of documents, falsification of books of account and financial statements, and acceptance of deposits contrary to the statutory framework. Because the defaults were described as incurable and closely connected with pending criminal prosecutions under penal law, compounding would prejudice the prosecution. The requests for compounding were therefore declined, and the applicant was held not entitled to compounding of the offences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 752 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340249</link>
      <description>Compounding of Companies Act offences is limited to inadvertent, bona fide statutory lapses and is inappropriate where the defaults involve deliberate and mala fide non-compliance. On the stated facts, the misconduct included fabrication of documents, falsification of books of account and financial statements, and acceptance of deposits contrary to the statutory framework. Because the defaults were described as incurable and closely connected with pending criminal prosecutions under penal law, compounding would prejudice the prosecution. The requests for compounding were therefore declined, and the applicant was held not entitled to compounding of the offences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>