<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7102</link>
    <description>Section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 gives a general right of set-off, but its second proviso creates an exception where the assessee is an unregistered firm not assessed under section 23(5)(b). The text explains that an individual partner cannot treat himself and the firm as the same assessee to bypass that exception, because the firm and partner are distinct capacities for tax purposes. Where the firm&#039;s loss has already been assessed in the hands of the unregistered firm, the partner&#039;s attempt to set off his share of that loss against personal income is barred. The claim was therefore disallowed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 23 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7102</link>
      <description>Section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 gives a general right of set-off, but its second proviso creates an exception where the assessee is an unregistered firm not assessed under section 23(5)(b). The text explains that an individual partner cannot treat himself and the firm as the same assessee to bypass that exception, because the firm and partner are distinct capacities for tax purposes. Where the firm&#039;s loss has already been assessed in the hands of the unregistered firm, the partner&#039;s attempt to set off his share of that loss against personal income is barred. The claim was therefore disallowed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>