<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 740 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340237</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Income Tax Settlement Commission prematurely abated proceedings before the six-month period expired. The Court extended the time for conclusion by three months, directing day-to-day or weekly proceedings without undue adjournments. The order dated 19.12.2016 was set aside, and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication. The writ petitions were allowed, and stay applications disposed of, with a directive to place the order on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 740 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340237</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Income Tax Settlement Commission prematurely abated proceedings before the six-month period expired. The Court extended the time for conclusion by three months, directing day-to-day or weekly proceedings without undue adjournments. The order dated 19.12.2016 was set aside, and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication. The writ petitions were allowed, and stay applications disposed of, with a directive to place the order on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>