<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 734 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340231</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer erred in forming the opinion that income had escaped assessment for AY 2009-10. The court quashed the notice under Section 148 and the proceedings for reopening the assessment. The petition was allowed, ruling in favor of the assessee and setting aside the notice and proceedings without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 734 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340231</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer erred in forming the opinion that income had escaped assessment for AY 2009-10. The court quashed the notice under Section 148 and the proceedings for reopening the assessment. The petition was allowed, ruling in favor of the assessee and setting aside the notice and proceedings without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>