<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 619 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191058</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and upholding the decree of the appellate Court, thereby decreeing the suit in favor of the appellant in a property transaction dispute. The High Court erred in reviewing the judgment without proper consideration of evidence and relevant precedents, wrongly placing the burden on the appellant to establish the nature of the transaction. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 16:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 619 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191058</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and upholding the decree of the appellate Court, thereby decreeing the suit in favor of the appellant in a property transaction dispute. The High Court erred in reviewing the judgment without proper consideration of evidence and relevant precedents, wrongly placing the burden on the appellant to establish the nature of the transaction. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>