<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (8) TMI 57 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191056</link>
    <description>Section 7 of the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act was construed as prescribing an exhaustive list of deductions from gross agricultural income. Because the statute set out allowable deductions in specific terms, expenditure falling outside those categories could not be implied merely on the ground that it was incidental to earning the income. Printing and stationery charges were therefore not deductible, and the claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 16:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (8) TMI 57 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191056</link>
      <description>Section 7 of the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act was construed as prescribing an exhaustive list of deductions from gross agricultural income. Because the statute set out allowable deductions in specific terms, expenditure falling outside those categories could not be implied merely on the ground that it was incidental to earning the income. Printing and stationery charges were therefore not deductible, and the claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>