<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191043</link>
    <description>The character of the dedication, management history, documentary recitals and public worship evidence showed that the Shri Vithal Rukhamai Sansthan at Amalner was held out as a temple for an indeterminate Hindu public. The property was treated in the name of the Devasthan, successive saints acted as managers rather than owners, and gifts and grants were made for worship and maintenance of the deity. Public participation in darshan, bhajan, festivals and processions further indicated a public religious institution. On that basis, the Sansthan was recognised as a public trust, not a private religious endowment, and registration as a public trust was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191043</link>
      <description>The character of the dedication, management history, documentary recitals and public worship evidence showed that the Shri Vithal Rukhamai Sansthan at Amalner was held out as a temple for an indeterminate Hindu public. The property was treated in the name of the Devasthan, successive saints acted as managers rather than owners, and gifts and grants were made for worship and maintenance of the deity. Public participation in darshan, bhajan, festivals and processions further indicated a public religious institution. On that basis, the Sansthan was recognised as a public trust, not a private religious endowment, and registration as a public trust was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>