<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, excluding disputed comparables from the final list for both ITeS and IT (CSD) segments. The appeal was allowed based on the need for a consistent approach in selecting/rejecting comparables with identical facts. The decision was rendered on 31st May 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, excluding disputed comparables from the final list for both ITeS and IT (CSD) segments. The appeal was allowed based on the need for a consistent approach in selecting/rejecting comparables with identical facts. The decision was rendered on 31st May 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>