<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (2) TMI 21 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191022</link>
    <description>A company registered under Section 26 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as a company for income-tax purposes because it retained corporate character and fell within the wide statutory definition in the Income-tax Act, 1922; it was therefore assessable as such. However, exemption under Section 9(1) for the occupied portion of premises was denied because that relief applies only where the property is used for a real, systematic business, profession or vocation whose profits are assessable as such. The assessee&#039;s receipts from managing other bodies and registering trade marks were incidental and insubstantial, and were treated as income from other sources, not vocational profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (2) TMI 21 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191022</link>
      <description>A company registered under Section 26 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as a company for income-tax purposes because it retained corporate character and fell within the wide statutory definition in the Income-tax Act, 1922; it was therefore assessable as such. However, exemption under Section 9(1) for the occupied portion of premises was denied because that relief applies only where the property is used for a real, systematic business, profession or vocation whose profits are assessable as such. The assessee&#039;s receipts from managing other bodies and registering trade marks were incidental and insubstantial, and were treated as income from other sources, not vocational profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>