<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 961 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191019</link>
    <description>Appeals in the customs matter were admitted by the SC, and the stay applications were dismissed as not pressed after the Solicitor General stated that stay was not being pressed because the respondent was a public sector undertaking. The order records only this procedural disposition and does not decide the substantive customs issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 961 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191019</link>
      <description>Appeals in the customs matter were admitted by the SC, and the stay applications were dismissed as not pressed after the Solicitor General stated that stay was not being pressed because the respondent was a public sector undertaking. The order records only this procedural disposition and does not decide the substantive customs issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>