<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 727 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the liabilities demanded under GTA service and Site formation &amp;amp; clearance service were not sustainable. The correctness of the taxable service value required re-verification by jurisdictional officers. The appeal was disposed of based on the above findings, highlighting the importance of factual verification and legal substantiation in tax liability disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 727 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the liabilities demanded under GTA service and Site formation &amp;amp; clearance service were not sustainable. The correctness of the taxable service value required re-verification by jurisdictional officers. The appeal was disposed of based on the above findings, highlighting the importance of factual verification and legal substantiation in tax liability disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>