<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 725 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340222</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order disallowing the refund claim for specified services in software development and business support was set aside. The Member (Judicial) found the disallowance unjustified due to the absence of a show-cause notice and relied on previous Tribunal judgments in the appellant&#039;s favor. The appellant was declared eligible for the refund, with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:21:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 725 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340222</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order disallowing the refund claim for specified services in software development and business support was set aside. The Member (Judicial) found the disallowance unjustified due to the absence of a show-cause notice and relied on previous Tribunal judgments in the appellant&#039;s favor. The appellant was declared eligible for the refund, with any consequential reliefs granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>